<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Omnia Tempus &#187; Product Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/category/product-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog</link>
	<description>All Things in Time - BD Handspicker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Strategy: Early Market Development and &#8220;The Rubber-Chicken Circuit&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/05/14/strategy-early-market-development-and-the-rubber-chicken-circuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/05/14/strategy-early-market-development-and-the-rubber-chicken-circuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 21:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/05/14/strategy-early-market-development-and-the-rubber-chicken-circuit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On his blog &#8220;The Post Money Value&#8220;, Rick Segal has some excellent advice for early-stage entreprenuers that find themselves in the spot-light of The Rubber Chicken Circuit. Few startups have the people resources to be able to afford to galavant &#8230; <a href="http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/05/14/strategy-early-market-development-and-the-rubber-chicken-circuit/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/05/14/strategy-early-market-development-and-the-rubber-chicken-circuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strategy: Competitive Standards Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/27/competitive-standards-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/27/competitive-standards-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/27/competitive-standards-strategy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While competitors and customers believe in standards that are fair, impartial and open, a company's competitive interests are often met by seeking unfair, proprietary and closely controlled advantage. Yet the open standards process is valuable to a company in broadening the potential market, building a positive market reputation and building a community of potential customers. The challenge is to participate in and drive standards in a fair, impartial and open manner while internally pursuing an aggressive competitive product, market and standards strategy. <a href="http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/27/competitive-standards-strategy/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/27/competitive-standards-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strategy: Lessons from Texas Hold&#8217;em</title>
		<link>http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/20/strategy-lessons-from-texas-holdem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/20/strategy-lessons-from-texas-holdem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/20/strategy-lessons-from-texas-holdem/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t play cards, but I enjoy watching Texas Hold&#8217;em poker on TV. One might think that watching other people play cards would be boring. On the contrary. Poker games present a microcosm of strategy, tactics, personality traits and clues. &#8230; <a href="http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/20/strategy-lessons-from-texas-holdem/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/20/strategy-lessons-from-texas-holdem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Business Planning: Software Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/19/business-planning-software-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/19/business-planning-software-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/19/business-planning-software-patents/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Up until the last few years I have not been a fan of software patents. My rationale for my disdain of software patents was purely pragmatic. Developing approvable patent applications takes significant time from senior engineers which distracts them from &#8230; <a href="http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/19/business-planning-software-patents/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bd.handspicker.net/blog/archives/2006/04/19/business-planning-software-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

